That sort of thing is fine with "just music," but great albums are holistic artistic creations that deserve to be respected as having an intended sequence and arc, a defined beginning and end. To have the untitled debut relegated to such treatment (while better, I suppose, than if it were not available at all)—well, it's a tawdry fate for a record that ought to be celebrated as one of the artistic high points of the 1980s.
Throwing Muses as first constituted, in a 1986 4AD promo photograph. Drummer
David Narcizo, Kristin Hersh, Tanya Donelly, and bassist Leslie Langston.
David Narcizo, Kristin Hersh, Tanya Donelly, and bassist Leslie Langston.
Despite my appreciation for the first album, I eventually drifted away from the band. Nothing could match the vivid intensity of the emotions on the first album and, starting at about Red Heaven in 1992, Hersh's high-frequency hearing had obviously started to go, and consequently the recordings are loaded with so much excess high-frequency energy that they verge on painful on anything but an old silver-faced receiver with tone controls. The Curse hurts my ears—it makes me yearn for earplugs even at moderate volumes—and Hersh's almost unlistenably shrill solo record Hips and Makers was the last thing of hers I bought, although I admit I feel guilty about it sometimes. My respect for her and her songwriting has never abated.
I also think I respond to the Lennon/McCartneyesque dual-personality interplay of Hersh and her stepsister Tanya Donelly in the band's early days, and just plain miss it in the later albums. Donelly was tagged as being more of a "pop" influence than the angrier, more raw-edged, mentally tainted Hersh, and perhaps that's true in the superficial way of most such generalizations. But although the two couldn't get along in the end—Donelly had already formed The Breeders with The Pixies' Kim Deal by 1988 as a side project—their powerful synergy and complementary push-and-pull (and perhaps their interpersonal friction, too) gave the band's early projects a compelling, lively volatility.
Which brings me around to The Real Ramona. Recorded in 1991, it was the band's fourth album and Donelly's last with the Muses, at least until their 2003 reunion. Although it doesn't reach the artistic heights of the untitled album (few records by anybody do), The Real Ramona is the band's most rollicking, zany, and ear-friendly release, and a pleasure to listen to—the production is solidly mainstream and all the songs are superb. It's the TM album to own if you're going to shelve only one, IMHO. Who knows why it's so little remarked on or listened to now? It's never gotten its due as a great record. Maybe the band's coldness to commercial ambition; maybe the chaotic, confused state of music at that time; maybe a touch of good old Murkin misogyny? I have no clue.
For me, it will always be a desert island disc, reserved for savoring at increasingly longer intervals, but each listen a special occasion.
CLICK HERE to buy this CD if you're in the U.S.
CLICK HERE to buy this CD if you're in Germany
CLICK HERE to buy this CD if you're in the U.K.
"Not to Soon" has always been one of my favorite pop songs... I think you're right about these albums.
ReplyDeleteIt's hard for me to choose a favorite Muses record, but The Real Ramona is right up there. And as much as the first record was breakthrough, House Tornado is the more brilliant one to me. It took many qualities from the first one and sort of crystallized them. It plays like a concept album (dare i say the C-word) and creates the darkest, most interesting mood. Ah well, they were certainly a great band....totally underappreciated. But that's Art for you!
ReplyDeleteI played the hell out of my 'Real Ramona' CD. I agree, I now savor it at increasingly longer intervals, but each time I hear it is a special occasion, indeed.
ReplyDelete